Warning given over AD commercial success
A former chairman of the Composting Association, Trelawney Dampney, has warned councils against "charging off" down the anaerobic digestion route before checking if the technology is "commercially sensible".
Mr Trelawney Dampney, managing director of Eco Composting Ltd in Poole, said analysis carried out by his firm had found that the technology - which processes organic waste to produce electricity and a soil fertilizer - was not economically viable.
He said: "Everyone is charging off down this route without looking at basic economics of it- we need to have a reality check to make sure it is commercially sensible."
The technology has gained in popularity following the publication of the English waste strategy which promoted AD to treat source segregated bio-waste.
ROCs
And it has also attracted attention because under renewable energy rules, from 2009 operators can have double the standard amount of renewable obligation certificates - known as ROCs - allocated to the process which accordingly gives a larger financial benefit.
However, Mr Dampney claimed that even with these concessions, his company's analysis found against AD technology.
He explained: "From an economic perspective, you would need treble or even quadruple ROCs to make the technology economically viable. Councils need to consider whether the income from the power generated, outweighs any extra capital costs you need to put into the plant? Our analysis show in the short term it is not cheaper than in-vessel composting."
Mr Dampney pointed to examples in Europe which appeared to show in-vessel composting was a better financial option.
He explained: "On the continent small anaerobic digestion plants get 3 or 4 times ROCs which makes it economically viable. The UK is only offering double ROCs.
"You are looking at having a £2 million pound AD site for a 20,000 tonne capacity site whereas an IVC is likely to be around £1 million."
Your Blog Master is a great fan of Trelawney Dampney and he can hardly be wrong can he?
Please give your Blog Master, Steve your views on this. If commenting on the blog site is not to your liking or convenience please email me at info[at]anaerobic-digestion.com (replace [at] with "@"), and please give me permission to post your comments to this blog. We would all be delighted to hear your views, and especially views from any AD Plant owners, on this point.
A former chairman of the Composting Association, Trelawney Dampney, has warned councils against "charging off" down the anaerobic digestion route before checking if the technology is "commercially sensible".
Mr Trelawney Dampney, managing director of Eco Composting Ltd in Poole, said analysis carried out by his firm had found that the technology - which processes organic waste to produce electricity and a soil fertilizer - was not economically viable.
He said: "Everyone is charging off down this route without looking at basic economics of it- we need to have a reality check to make sure it is commercially sensible."
The technology has gained in popularity following the publication of the English waste strategy which promoted AD to treat source segregated bio-waste.
ROCs
And it has also attracted attention because under renewable energy rules, from 2009 operators can have double the standard amount of renewable obligation certificates - known as ROCs - allocated to the process which accordingly gives a larger financial benefit.
However, Mr Dampney claimed that even with these concessions, his company's analysis found against AD technology.
He explained: "From an economic perspective, you would need treble or even quadruple ROCs to make the technology economically viable. Councils need to consider whether the income from the power generated, outweighs any extra capital costs you need to put into the plant? Our analysis show in the short term it is not cheaper than in-vessel composting."
Mr Dampney pointed to examples in Europe which appeared to show in-vessel composting was a better financial option.
He explained: "On the continent small anaerobic digestion plants get 3 or 4 times ROCs which makes it economically viable. The UK is only offering double ROCs.
"You are looking at having a £2 million pound AD site for a 20,000 tonne capacity site whereas an IVC is likely to be around £1 million."
Your Blog Master is a great fan of Trelawney Dampney and he can hardly be wrong can he?
Please give your Blog Master, Steve your views on this. If commenting on the blog site is not to your liking or convenience please email me at info[at]anaerobic-digestion.com (replace [at] with "@"), and please give me permission to post your comments to this blog. We would all be delighted to hear your views, and especially views from any AD Plant owners, on this point.
1 comment:
Have you heard all the latest advances in super clean ,renewable geothermal technology? You can now not only cool and heat your home and business this energy efficient way but heat your POOL also!!! There is some very exciting news well worth looking into , along with tax rebates being offered.
Post a Comment